ZERO ENERGY BUILDING (ZEB)
Building
energy consumption is generally recognized as one of the main sectors
contributing to the whole primary energy consumption and greenhouse gas
emissions in the world, which greatly raise public awareness on building energy
conservation in recent years. Green building (GB), low-energy building (LEB),
and nearly/net-zero energy building (ZEB/nZEB/NZEB) are widely developed for
the advantages of low-energy demand in the building, efficient energy system
operation, and integration of renewable energy system [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].
In addition, numerous incentive policies, such as investment subsidies, feed-in
tariff, net-metering schemes, etc., have been applied to promote the
application of renewable energy sources [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16],
thus paving the way for future zero target for buildings.
The
concept of ZEB/nZEB is extended from autonomous buildings that are targeted to
operate off-grid by installing enough solar PV and/or wind turbine for the
generation of all the energy the building required to include grid-connected
ZEB that is aimed to balance annual energy exchange with the grid. The off-grid
ZEB has also been named “autonomous” or “stand-alone” building as shown
in Figure 1, which can be defined as “Zero Stand Alone
Buildings are buildings that do not require connection to the grid or only as a
backup. Stand-alone buildings can autonomously supply themselves with energy,
as they have the capacity to store energy for night-time or wintertime use”
Basic
elements in the definition of off-grid zero energy building.
The on-grid ZEB is a “grid-connected” or “grid-integrated” net-zero energy building that is connected to one or more energy infrastructure as shown in Figure 2; it can be defined as “Zero Net Energy Buildings are buildings that over a year are neutral, meaning that they deliver as much energy to the supply grids as they use from the grids. Seen in these terms they do not need any fossil fuel for heating, cooling, lighting or other energy uses although they sometimes draw energy from the grid”
Figure 2.
Basic elements in the definition of on-grid net-zero energy
building.
However, no national ZEB codes and international standards have
been developed since numerous proposed approaches spotlight different aspects
of ZEB. The metric applied for the “zero” balance is a vital issue since
it affects how renewable energy system will be selected to achieve this goal.
Torcellini et al. [18] introduced four different nZEB
definitions, including site nZEB, source nZEB, emissions nZEB, and cost nZEB,
as defined below:
§ Site nZEB: A site
nZEB produces at least as much energy as it uses in a year when accounted for
at the site.
§ Source nZEB: A
source nZEB produces at least as much energy as it uses in a year when
accounted for at the source. Source energy refers to the primary energy used to
generate and deliver the energy to the site.
§ Emission nZEB: A
net-zero emission building produces at least as much emission-free renewable
energy as it uses from emission-producing energy sources.
§ Cost nZEB: In a cost
nZEB, the amount of money the utility pays the building owner for the energy
the building exports to the grid is at least equal to the amount the owner pays
the utility for the energy services and energy used over the year.
The concept of balance can be defined in the following mathematical equations, the balance between export and import energies (Eq. (1)) or the balance between load and generation (Eq. (2)) .The balance between load and generation is generally used as a basic requirement during the design phase of ZEB. By contrast, the balance between export and import energies is particularly useful for evaluating its matchability between load and generation and the interaction between building and grid. In the previous study, most studies defined “net” as the building energy consumption and RES generation to be equal:
Netenergy=
/Export/‐ /Import/
≥ E1
i.e.
∑iExported _ energy (i) × weight(i) ‐ ∑iImported_energy(i) × weight(i )≥
0
Netenerg y= / Generation / ‐ / Load/ ≥ 0 i.e.∑iGeneratio
n_ energy(i) × weigh (i)‐ ∑iLoad_energy (i) ×weight (i) ≥ 0 E2
2. Incentive policies
Substantial policies and regulations have been
provided to support the installation of RES power plants and thus simulate the
widespread of ZEB applications. Under the support of these policies, an
increasing number of ZEB case studies have been conducted, and there are over
360 ZEB projects which had been identified in different countries till 2013, as
shown in Figure 3.
Figure
3.
World
map of more than 360 internationally known net-zero energy buildings [20].
The
continued growth in ZEB projects is mainly driven by the progressive financial
incentives on renewable energy promotion, which is summarized for several
countries from different parts of the world, as shown in Table
1. The main support policies on RES in different countries are
described as follows [6]:
§ Investment
subsidies: Based on a percentage of the renewable energy output or the specific
investment upfront cost.
§ Feed-in
tariff: The producer receives total payments per kWh of generated electricity
at a fixed price. It is guaranteed by the government.
§ Net-metering
schemes: Net-metering (NM) and self-consumption (SC) schemes. Billing agreement
between utilities and their customers to feed electricity the producer does not
use back into the grid.
§ Tradable Green Certificates: Certificates that can be sold in the market, allowing RES generators to obtain revenue, in addition to the earnings from the sale of electricity fed into the grid.
Incentive
policies |
Australia |
Belgium |
China |
France |
Germany |
Italy |
Japan |
Spain |
The United
Kingdom |
The United
States |
Renewable
energy targets |
O |
O |
R |
R |
O |
O |
R |
O |
O |
R* |
Feed-in
tariff/premium payment |
• |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
O |
R* |
||
Electric
utility quota obligation/RPS |
O |
• |
O |
O |
O |
R* |
||||
Net
metering |
• |
O |
O |
O |
R* |
|||||
Tradable
REC |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
• |
||
Capital
subsidy, grant, or rebate |
O |
• |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
Reduc-tions
in sales, energy, CO2, VAT, or other taxes |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
|||
Public
invest-ment, loans, or grants |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
No comments:
Post a Comment